At least once I day, I log into cnn.com and read through the stories of the day so I know what's going on. I don't bother with the videos or ireports because I find the videos to be light on content and the ireports to be...well...random people just ranting.

 

During this time, I usually end up reading a few political articles as well.  I know I shouldn't because it either annoys as to how stupid our politicians are or just wastes my time about something that the media is once again blowing out of porportions in order to get people to care.

 

Anyway, I have now identified the dumbest contributor to cnn.com (which is a pretty impressive feat given how any stupid ones are out there). I could give this to some random extreme one who may or not believe the crazy things they say but I'm giving it to one who clearly deserves it.

 

A year ago, I blogged about how stupid Ed Rollins was for talking about the Sarah Palin SNL skit and using that as an example of how great she was (what poise and what charisma and it wasn't even her).  This time around, he brought up SNL but about Obama.  In his article though, he brought up the Palin skit again and talked about how it started her downfall.  WTF?!?!  I'm sorry but you just did a 180 and you also give SNL credit for her downfall, seriously?  Could it have been her interview on prime time that fell flat or the constant attention of the news media on issues big and small?  Nope, it was the SNL skits.

 

He also says that SNL is responsible for Bush being seeing as the wacky goofball rather than the serious politician.  Once again, was it not the constant media coverage and clips played over and over again on all of the news stations that contributed to this image?

 

Now he's saying that the sketch of Obama on SNL last saturday is going to sink his presidency.  Sigh, this guy is seriously a moron and should not be allowed to talk anymore.